Summary of Common Errors when filling out the Distribution of
Banked Credits Form
- Incorrect information is listed for the recorded holder(s)
such as client, phone and fax numbers;
- The contiguity sketch is not included when assigning
assessment credits to contiguous claims;
- The contiguity sketch is not legible and/or does not outline
the contiguous link between the claims;
- Unsigned/undated Certification by recorded holder or agent;
- An agent or optionee files the distribution for the recorded
holder without including written authorization from the recorded
holder;
- The recorded holder authorizes a company, however the
employee submitting the application is not authorized as agent
for the company;
- Two or more Work Declaration Numbers are listed in column 1;.
- The incorrect Work Declaration Number is listed in column 1
or is not listed at all;
- The current plus five year allowance is exceeded when
applying or assigning credits to claims;
- Applying or assigning too little to maintain the claim in
good standing (typically caused by not knowing or indicating the
wrong number of units for the claim(s));
- Exceeding the yearly assignment of $24,000 per unit to a
maximum of $96,000 for unpatented claims or $1,500 per hectare to
a maximum of $96,000 for leases and patents (note that applying
to the claim itself is not considered an assignment of credit);
- Mathematical mistakes (always make sure that the total of
column 4 equals the total of column 5);
- Numerous contiguity problems, based on the parameters of
geography, ownership/beneficial interest and/or time, as
summarized below:
Claims are not contiguous in terms of geography:
The claim block is separated by Crown Land and/or
claims/leases/patents held by other recorded holder(s).
Claims are not contiguous in terms of time:
Some claim(s) receiving the credit were recorded after the
original (parent) work was completed.
Claims were forfeited but later re-staked by the same recorded
holder(s). If the original claims were important in providing a
contiguous linkage, then the linkage has been broken for all work
performed prior to the recording of the new staked claim(s).
Claims are not contiguous in terms of beneficial interest or
ownership:
A person or company acquires a beneficial interest or ownership
in a block of mining lands (Block A) that is geographically
linked to a group of their own claims (Block B). The person or
company then wants to assign work credits from the mining lands
they acquired (A) onto their own claims (B). The person or
company may only assign from Block A to B if they had a
beneficial interest in Block A from the time the work was
performed through to the filing of the distribution of assessment
work credits.
A person or company acquires a beneficial interest/ownership in
Block A and wants to assign/apply reserve work credits within
Block A. If the person or company did not have an
interest/ownership when the work was performed then the reserve
credits on any given claim within Block A can only be applied or
assigned within Block A.